1
0
mirror of https://github.com/andre-wojtowicz/blas-benchmarks synced 2024-11-28 17:35:28 +01:00

added Intel Core i5-6500;

changed results view of gcbd benchmark to relative performance gain;
changed reference CPU and GPU;
target architecture detection fixes
This commit is contained in:
Andrzej Wójtowicz 2016-07-14 17:26:58 +02:00
parent a9ab240dcf
commit 107beaa3d2
305 changed files with 614 additions and 496 deletions

430
README.md
View File

@ -1,9 +1,13 @@
# BLAS libraries benchmarks
Andrzej Wójtowicz
[![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/22705/andre-wojtowicz/blas-benchmarks.svg)](https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.55662)
Document generation date: 2016-07-14 17:20:41
Document generation date: 2016-06-06 22:40:18
This document presents timing results for BLAS ([Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Linear_Algebra_Subprograms)) libraries in [R](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(programming_language)) on diverse CPUs and GPUs.
### Changelog
* 2016-07-14: **results:** added Intel Core i5-6500; changed results view of gcbd benchmark to relative performance gain; changed reference CPU (Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300) and GPU (NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M); **code:** fixed target architecture detection for Intel Core i5-6500-like CPUs in multi-threaded Atlas library; added info how to force target architecture in GotoBLAS2 and BLIS libraries.
@ -14,6 +18,7 @@ Document generation date: 2016-06-06 22:40:18
* [Intel Core i7-4790K + MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning](#intel-core-i7-4790k--msi-geforce-gtx-980-ti-lightning)
* [Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 430](#intel-core-i5-4590--nvidia-geforce-gt-430)
* [Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti](#intel-core-i5-4590--nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti)
* [Intel Core i5-6500](#intel-core-i5-6500)
* [Intel Core i5-3570](#intel-core-i5-3570)
* [Intel Core i3-2120](#intel-core-i3-2120)
* [Intel Core i3-3120M](#intel-core-i3-3120m)
@ -33,7 +38,7 @@ Document generation date: 2016-06-06 22:40:18
## Configuration
**OS**: Debian Jessie, kernel 4.4
**OS**: [Debian](https://www.debian.org/) Jessie, kernel 4.4
**R software**: [Microsoft R Open](https://mran.microsoft.com/open/) (3.2.4)
@ -54,11 +59,12 @@ Document generation date: 2016-06-06 22:40:18
|1.|[Intel Core i7-4790K](http://ark.intel.com/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_40-GHz) (OC 4.5 GHz)|[MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning](https://us.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-980-Ti-LIGHTNING.html#hero-specification)|
|2.|[Intel Core i5-4590](http://ark.intel.com/products/80815/Intel-Core-i5-4590-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 430](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-430/specifications)|
|3.|[Intel Core i5-4590](http://ark.intel.com/products/80815/Intel-Core-i5-4590-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-750-ti/specifications)|
|4.|[Intel Core i5-3570](http://ark.intel.com/products/65702/Intel-Core-i5-3570-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz)| - |
|5.|[Intel Core i3-2120](http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/Intel-Core-i3-2120-Processor-3M-Cache-3_30-GHz)| - |
|6.|[Intel Core i3-3120M](http://ark.intel.com/products/71465/Intel-Core-i3-3120M-Processor-3M-Cache-2_50-GHz)| - |
|7.|[Intel Core i5-3317U](http://ark.intel.com/products/65707/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_60-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-630m/specifications)|
|8.|[Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300](http://ark.intel.com/products/35300/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5300-2M-Cache-2_60-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)| - |
|4.|[Intel Core i5-6500](http://ark.intel.com/products/88184/Intel-Core-i5-6500-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_60-GHz)| - |
|5.|[Intel Core i5-3570](http://ark.intel.com/products/65702/Intel-Core-i5-3570-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz)| - |
|6.|[Intel Core i3-2120](http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/Intel-Core-i3-2120-Processor-3M-Cache-3_30-GHz)| - |
|7.|[Intel Core i3-3120M](http://ark.intel.com/products/71465/Intel-Core-i3-3120M-Processor-3M-Cache-2_50-GHz)| - |
|8.|[Intel Core i5-3317U](http://ark.intel.com/products/65707/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_60-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-630m/specifications)|
|9.|[Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300](http://ark.intel.com/products/35300/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5300-2M-Cache-2_60-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)| - |
**Benchmarks**: [R-benchmark-25](http://r.research.att.com/benchmarks/R-benchmark-25.R), [Revolution](https://gist.github.com/andrie/24c9672f1ea39af89c66#file-rro-mkl-benchmark-r), [Gcbd](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gcbd/vignettes/gcbd.pdf).
@ -176,33 +182,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h1_b3_t4.png)
@ -314,33 +320,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h2_b3_t4.png)
@ -452,37 +458,37 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h3_b3_t4.png)
## Intel Core i5-3570
## Intel Core i5-6500
@ -590,37 +596,37 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h4_b3_t4.png)
## Intel Core i3-2120
## Intel Core i5-3570
@ -728,37 +734,37 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h5_b3_t4.png)
## Intel Core i3-3120M
## Intel Core i3-2120
@ -866,37 +872,37 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h6_b3_t4.png)
## Intel Core i5-3317U + NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
## Intel Core i3-3120M
@ -1004,37 +1010,37 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t4.png)
## Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300
## Intel Core i5-3317U + NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
@ -1058,8 +1064,6 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Eigenvalues of a 600x600 random matrix
BLIS hangs in this test
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b1_t3.png)
@ -1144,33 +1148,173 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_ph_h8_b3_t4.png)
## Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300
### R-benchmark-25
#### 2800x2800 cross-product matrix
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t1.png)
#### Linear regr. over a 2000x2000 matrix
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t2.png)
#### Eigenvalues of a 600x600 random matrix
BLIS hangs in this test
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t3.png)
#### Determinant of a 2500x2500 random matrix
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t4.png)
#### Cholesky decomposition of a 3000x3000 matrix
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t5.png)
#### Inverse of a 1600x1600 random matrix
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t6.png)
#### Escoufier's method on a 45x45 matrix
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b1_t7.png)
### Revolution benchmark
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b2_t1.png)
#### Cholesky Factorization
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b2_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b2_t3.png)
#### Principal Components Analysis
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b2_t4.png)
#### Linear Discriminant Analysis
Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b2_t5.png)
### Gcbd benchmark
#### Matrix Multiply
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_ph_h9_b3_t4.png)
@ -1285,33 +1429,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l1_b3_t4.png)
@ -1423,33 +1567,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l2_b3_t4.png)
@ -1561,33 +1705,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l3_b3_t4.png)
@ -1699,33 +1843,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l4_b3_t4.png)
@ -1837,33 +1981,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l5_b3_t4.png)
@ -1975,33 +2119,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l6_b3_t4.png)
@ -2115,33 +2259,33 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b3_t4.png)
@ -2253,31 +2397,31 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
#### Matrix Multiply
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t1b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t1.png)
#### QR Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t2b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t2.png)
#### Singular Value Deomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t3b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t3.png)
#### Triangular Decomposition
Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale - from 50 to 5 runs - lower is better
Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t4b.png)
![](gen/img/img_pl_l8_b3_t4.png)

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 19 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 56 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 33 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 29 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 32 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 32 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 33 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 20 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 51 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 34 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 52 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 31 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 31 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 46 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 32 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 34 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 48 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 31 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 20 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 51 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 33 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 32 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 32 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 46 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 32 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 33 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 31 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 52 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 34 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.6 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.6 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.6 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 18 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 43 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 41 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 30 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 29 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 39 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 29 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 19 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 44 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 30 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.6 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 46 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 43 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 28 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 30 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 43 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 49 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 28 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.6 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 46 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 42 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 27 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 29 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 42 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 28 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 22 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 43 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 29 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.3 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.1 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.7 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.0 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.6 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.3 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.3 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.9 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.8 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 23 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 44 KiB

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More