added Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300

README.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # BLAS libraries benchmarks
 Andrzej Wójtowicz  
 
-Document generation date: 2016-05-30 23:06:11
+Document generation date: 2016-06-03 15:36:31
 
 
 
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Document generation date: 2016-05-30 23:06:11
     * [Intel Core i3-2120](#intel-core-i3-2120)
     * [Intel Core i3-3120M](#intel-core-i3-3120m)
     * [Intel Core i5-3317U + NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M](#intel-core-i5-3317u--nvidia-geforce-gt-630m)
+    * [Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300](#intel-pentium-dual-core-e5300)
  3. [Results per library](#results-per-library)
     * [Netlib](#netlib)
     * [Atlas (st)](#atlas-st)
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ Document generation date: 2016-05-30 23:06:11
 |4.|[Intel Core i3-2120](http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/Intel-Core-i3-2120-Processor-3M-Cache-3_30-GHz)| - |
 |5.|[Intel Core i3-3120M](http://ark.intel.com/products/71465/Intel-Core-i3-3120M-Processor-3M-Cache-2_50-GHz)| - |
 |6.|[Intel Core i5-3317U](http://ark.intel.com/products/65707/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_60-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-630m/specifications)|
+|7.|[Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300](http://ark.intel.com/products/35300/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5300-2M-Cache-2_60-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)| - |
 
 **Benchmarks**: [Urbanek](http://r.research.att.com/benchmarks/R-benchmark-25.R), [Revolution](https://gist.github.com/andrie/24c9672f1ea39af89c66#file-rro-mkl-benchmark-r), [Gcbd](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gcbd/vignettes/gcbd.pdf).
 
@@ -888,6 +890,146 @@ Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale -  from  50  to
 
 
 
+## Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300
+
+
+
+### Urbanek benchmark
+
+#### 2800x2800 cross-product matrix 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t1.png)
+
+
+
+#### Linear regr. over a 3000x3000 matrix 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t2.png)
+
+
+
+#### Eigenvalues of a 640x640 random matrix 
+
+BLIS hangs in this test
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t3.png)
+
+
+
+#### Determinant of a 2500x2500 random matrix 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t4.png)
+
+
+
+#### Cholesky decomposition of a 3000x3000 matrix 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t5.png)
+
+
+
+#### Inverse of a 1600x1600 random matrix 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t6.png)
+
+
+
+#### Escoufier's method on a 45x45 matrix 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b1_t7.png)
+
+
+
+### Revolution benchmark
+
+#### Matrix Multiply 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b2_t1.png)
+
+
+
+#### Cholesky Factorization 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b2_t2.png)
+
+
+
+#### Singular Value Deomposition 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b2_t3.png)
+
+
+
+#### Principal Components Analysis 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b2_t4.png)
+
+
+
+#### Linear Discriminant Analysis 
+
+Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b2_t5.png)
+
+
+
+### Gcbd benchmark
+
+#### Matrix Multiply 
+
+Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale -  from  50  to  5 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t1.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t1b.png)
+
+
+
+#### QR Decomposition 
+
+Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale -  from  50  to  5 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t2.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t2b.png)
+
+
+
+#### Singular Value Deomposition 
+
+Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale -  from  50  to  5 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t3.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t3b.png)
+
+
+
+#### Triangular Decomposition 
+
+Time in seconds regarding matrix size - right panel on log scale -  from  50  to  5 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t4.png)![](gen/img/img_ph_h7_b3_t4b.png)
+
+
+
 
 # Results per library
 
@@ -1743,6 +1885,8 @@ Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 #### Eigenvalues of a 640x640 random matrix 
 
+Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 hangs in this test
+
 Time in seconds  - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_pl_l7_b1_t3.png)