added Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

README.md

@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
 # BLAS libraries benchmarks
 Andrzej Wójtowicz  
 
-Document generation date: 2016-11-29 11:40:07
-
 [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.57910.svg)](http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.57910)
 
+Document generation date: 2016-11-30 13:07:14
+
 This document presents timing results for BLAS ([Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Linear_Algebra_Subprograms)) libraries in [R](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(programming_language)) on diverse CPUs and GPUs.
 
 ### Changelog
 
+ * 2016-11-30: **results:** added Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4.
  * 2016-11-29: **results:** added Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5.
  * 2016-11-25: **results:** added Intel Atom C2758.
  * 2016-07-14: **results:** added Intel Core i5-6500; changed results view of gcbd benchmark to relative performance gain; changed reference CPU (Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300) and GPU (NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M); **code:** fixed target architecture detection for Intel Core i5-6500-like CPUs in multi-threaded Atlas library; added info how to force target architecture in GotoBLAS2 and BLIS libraries.
@@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ This document presents timing results for BLAS ([Basic Linear Algebra Subprogram
  1. [Configuration](#configuration)
  2. [Results per host](#results-per-host)
     * [Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5](#intel-xeon-e3-1275-v5)
+    * [Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4](#intel-xeon-e5-1620-v4)
     * [Intel Core i7-4790K + MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning](#intel-core-i7-4790k--msi-geforce-gtx-980-ti-lightning)
     * [Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 430](#intel-core-i5-4590--nvidia-geforce-gt-430)
     * [Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti](#intel-core-i5-4590--nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti)
@@ -63,16 +65,17 @@ This document presents timing results for BLAS ([Basic Linear Algebra Subprogram
 |No.|CPU|GPU|
 |---|---|---|
 |1.|[Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5](http://ark.intel.com/products/88177/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E3-1275-v5-8M-Cache-3_60-GHz)| - |
-|2.|[Intel Core i7-4790K](http://ark.intel.com/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_40-GHz) (OC 4.5 GHz)|[MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning](https://us.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-980-Ti-LIGHTNING.html#hero-specification)|
+|2.|[Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4](http://ark.intel.com/products/64621/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-1620-10M-Cache-3_60-GHz-0_0-GTs-Intel-QPI)| - |
-|3.|[Intel Core i5-4590](http://ark.intel.com/products/80815/Intel-Core-i5-4590-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 430](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-430/specifications)|
+|3.|[Intel Core i7-4790K](http://ark.intel.com/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_40-GHz) (OC 4.5 GHz)|[MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning](https://us.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-980-Ti-LIGHTNING.html#hero-specification)|
-|4.|[Intel Core i5-4590](http://ark.intel.com/products/80815/Intel-Core-i5-4590-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-750-ti/specifications)|
+|4.|[Intel Core i5-4590](http://ark.intel.com/products/80815/Intel-Core-i5-4590-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 430](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-430/specifications)|
-|5.|[Intel Core i5-6500](http://ark.intel.com/products/88184/Intel-Core-i5-6500-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_60-GHz)| - |
+|5.|[Intel Core i5-4590](http://ark.intel.com/products/80815/Intel-Core-i5-4590-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_70-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-750-ti/specifications)|
-|6.|[Intel Core i5-3570](http://ark.intel.com/products/65702/Intel-Core-i5-3570-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz)| - |
+|6.|[Intel Core i5-6500](http://ark.intel.com/products/88184/Intel-Core-i5-6500-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_60-GHz)| - |
-|7.|[Intel Core i3-2120](http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/Intel-Core-i3-2120-Processor-3M-Cache-3_30-GHz)| - |
+|7.|[Intel Core i5-3570](http://ark.intel.com/products/65702/Intel-Core-i5-3570-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz)| - |
-|8.|[Intel Core i3-3120M](http://ark.intel.com/products/71465/Intel-Core-i3-3120M-Processor-3M-Cache-2_50-GHz)| - |
+|8.|[Intel Core i3-2120](http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/Intel-Core-i3-2120-Processor-3M-Cache-3_30-GHz)| - |
-|9.|[Intel Core i5-3317U](http://ark.intel.com/products/65707/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_60-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-630m/specifications)|
+|9.|[Intel Core i3-3120M](http://ark.intel.com/products/71465/Intel-Core-i3-3120M-Processor-3M-Cache-2_50-GHz)| - |
-|10.|[Intel Atom C2758](http://ark.intel.com/products/77988/Intel-Atom-Processor-C2758-4M-Cache-2_40-GHz)| - |
+|10.|[Intel Core i5-3317U](http://ark.intel.com/products/65707/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_60-GHz)|[NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M](http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-630m/specifications)|
-|11.|[Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300](http://ark.intel.com/products/35300/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5300-2M-Cache-2_60-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)| - |
+|11.|[Intel Atom C2758](http://ark.intel.com/products/77988/Intel-Atom-Processor-C2758-4M-Cache-2_40-GHz)| - |
+|12.|[Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300](http://ark.intel.com/products/35300/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5300-2M-Cache-2_60-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)| - |
 
 **Benchmarks**: [R-benchmark-25](http://r.research.att.com/benchmarks/R-benchmark-25.R), [Revolution](https://gist.github.com/andrie/24c9672f1ea39af89c66#file-rro-mkl-benchmark-r), [Gcbd](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gcbd/vignettes/gcbd.pdf).
 
@@ -220,7 +223,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i7-4790K + MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning
+## Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
 
 
 
@@ -358,7 +361,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
+## Intel Core i7-4790K + MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Lightning
 
 
 
@@ -496,7 +499,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+## Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
 
 
 
@@ -634,7 +637,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i5-6500
+## Intel Core i5-4590 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
 
 
 
@@ -772,7 +775,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i5-3570
+## Intel Core i5-6500
 
 
 
@@ -910,7 +913,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i3-2120
+## Intel Core i5-3570
 
 
 
@@ -1048,7 +1051,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i3-3120M
+## Intel Core i3-2120
 
 
 
@@ -1186,7 +1189,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Core i5-3317U + NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
+## Intel Core i3-3120M
 
 
 
@@ -1324,7 +1327,7 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 
 
-## Intel Atom C2758
+## Intel Core i5-3317U + NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
 
 
 
@@ -1356,8 +1359,6 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 #### Determinant of a 2500x2500 random matrix 
 
-ATLAS (mt) crashes in this test
-
 Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h10_b1_t4.png)
@@ -1374,8 +1375,6 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 #### Inverse of a 1600x1600 random matrix 
 
-ATLAS (mt) crashes in this test
-
 Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h10_b1_t6.png)
@@ -1460,15 +1459,13 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 #### Triangular Decomposition 
 
-ATLAS (mt) crashes in this test
-
 Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h10_b3_t4.png)
 
 
 
-## Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300
+## Intel Atom C2758
 
 
 
@@ -1492,8 +1489,6 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 #### Eigenvalues of a 600x600 random matrix 
 
-BLIS hangs in this test
-
 Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h11_b1_t3.png)
@@ -1502,6 +1497,8 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 #### Determinant of a 2500x2500 random matrix 
 
+ATLAS (mt) crashes in this test
+
 Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h11_b1_t4.png)
@@ -1518,6 +1515,8 @@ Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 #### Inverse of a 1600x1600 random matrix 
 
+ATLAS (mt) crashes in this test
+
 Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h11_b1_t6.png)
@@ -1602,12 +1601,154 @@ Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs -
 
 #### Triangular Decomposition 
 
+ATLAS (mt) crashes in this test
+
 Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
 
 ![](gen/img/img_ph_h11_b3_t4.png)
 
 
 
+## Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300
+
+
+
+### R-benchmark-25
+
+#### 2800x2800 cross-product matrix 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t1.png)
+
+
+
+#### Linear regr. over a 2000x2000 matrix 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t2.png)
+
+
+
+#### Eigenvalues of a 600x600 random matrix 
+
+BLIS hangs in this test
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t3.png)
+
+
+
+#### Determinant of a 2500x2500 random matrix 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t4.png)
+
+
+
+#### Cholesky decomposition of a 3000x3000 matrix 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t5.png)
+
+
+
+#### Inverse of a 1600x1600 random matrix 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t6.png)
+
+
+
+#### Escoufier's method on a 45x45 matrix 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b1_t7.png)
+
+
+
+### Revolution benchmark
+
+#### Matrix Multiply 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b2_t1.png)
+
+
+
+#### Cholesky Factorization 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b2_t2.png)
+
+
+
+#### Singular Value Deomposition 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b2_t3.png)
+
+
+
+#### Principal Components Analysis 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b2_t4.png)
+
+
+
+#### Linear Discriminant Analysis 
+
+Time in seconds - 10 runs - lower is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b2_t5.png)
+
+
+
+### Gcbd benchmark
+
+#### Matrix Multiply 
+
+Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b3_t1.png)
+
+
+
+#### QR Decomposition 
+
+Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b3_t2.png)
+
+
+
+#### Singular Value Deomposition 
+
+Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b3_t3.png)
+
+
+
+#### Triangular Decomposition 
+
+Performance gain regarding matrix size - reference: Netlib - from 50 to 5 runs - higher is better
+
+![](gen/img/img_ph_h12_b3_t4.png)
+
+
+
 
 # Results per library