2021-10-04 17:31:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
> Strona automatycznie zmigrowana z systemu Eduwiki z wykorzystaniem Pandoc
|
2021-10-04 16:58:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each role is defined in (can be downloaded for Faculty computers):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` `*`Borges`` ``P.,`` ``Monteiro`` ``P.,`` ``Machado`` ``R.J.`` ``(2012)`` ``Mapping`` ``RUP`` ``Roles`` ``to`` ``Small`` ``Software`` ``Development`` ``Teams.`` ``In:`` ``Biffl`` ``S.,`` ``Winkler`` ``D.,`` ``Bergsmann`` ``J.`` ``(eds)`` ``Software`` ``Quality.`` ``Process`` ``Automation`` ``in`` ``Software`` ``Development.`` ``SWQD`` ``2012.`` ``Lecture`` ``Notes`` ``in`` ``Business`` ``Information`` ``Processing,`` ``vol`` ``94.`` ``Springer,`` ``Berlin,`` ``Heidelberg`*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More detailed descriptions of roles can be found in books about RUP and
|
|
|
|
|
|
in RUP manuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1x Project Manager.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 2x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Schedule&Budget, 1x Team Management`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1x Process Engineer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 2x RUP compliance, 1x Team Training`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 2x System analyst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 2x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Communication with Customer, 1x Scope&Use Cases`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 2x Software Architect(+Database designer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Stack, 1x General architecture, 1x UML`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1x Integrator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Code review, 1x Coordination of submodules, 1x API documentation`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1x System Administrator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Infrastructure, 2x Deployment`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1x Test Manager.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x System reliability, 1x Test Plan, 1x Manual Tests`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1x User-interface Designer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 2x Customer Satisfaction, 1x UX design, 1x Usability`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 2x Course developer(+Project reviewer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x User manual, 1x Development documentation, 1x Documentation quality and review`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 2x System tester.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Manual tests, 1x Automatic tests, 1x System reliability`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 2-4x Implementator. Two teams for each of two submodules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
` 1x Customer Satisfaction, 1x Realization of architecture, 1x Code quality (review), 1x Automatic tests`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 16-18 persons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Grading criteria {#grading_criteria}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 5 points per each criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Customer Satisfaction: subjectively evaluated by Customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Schedule&Budget: in time realisation of project phases. Realization
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 3 iterations according to prepared schedule (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teacher)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Team Management: Team satisfaction (evaluated by all Team members)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- RUP compliance: Was project performed according to RUP process
|
|
|
|
|
|
(evaluated by Teacher)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Team Training: Organisation of training sessions for Team members
|
|
|
|
|
|
(evaluated by all Team members)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Code review: How much percentage of code was reviewed (1 point per
|
|
|
|
|
|
started 20%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Coordination of submodules: Whether submodules teams were able to
|
|
|
|
|
|
work separately (evaluated by Implementators)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- API documentation: Documentation presence and quality (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementators and Course developers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Communication with Customer: Quality and frequency of communication
|
|
|
|
|
|
(evaluated by Customer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Scope&Use Cases: Presence and quality of documents (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software Architects and Course developers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Stack: selection and documentation of software stack (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrator)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- General architecture: general description of system
|
|
|
|
|
|
structure(evaluated by Integrator and Course developers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- UML: diagrams presenting operation of main places in the system
|
|
|
|
|
|
(evaluated by Implementators)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Infrastructure: description of required infrastructure and getting
|
|
|
|
|
|
access to it (evaluated by Teacher)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Deployment: whether infrastructure was configured to enable easy
|
|
|
|
|
|
deployment of system and documentation of the process (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teacher and Integrator)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- System reliability: whether system works without visible errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
(evaluated by Customer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Test Plan: presence and quality of Test Plan (evaluated by System
|
|
|
|
|
|
testers and Course developers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Manual Tests: presence and quality of Test Report, conduction of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manual tests (evaluated by Teacher)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Automatic tests: How much percentage of code is covered by Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests (1 point per started 20%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- UX design: presence, quality and usage of UX design (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Usability: whether and quality of Usability tests (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teacher)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- User manual: presence and quality of User Manual (evaluated by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Development documentation: presence and quality of development
|
|
|
|
|
|
documentation (evaluated by Integrator)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Documentation quality and review: general quality of all
|
|
|
|
|
|
documentation in project (evaluated by Teacher)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Realization of architecture: (evaluated by Software Architects)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Code quality (review): (evaluated by Integrator)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Schedule outline {#schedule_outline}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Inception: 1 week
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Elaboration: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Implementation: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Transition: 1 week
|
