before changing etale case
This commit is contained in:
parent
48e2827cba
commit
3d4fdbd2a2
@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
|
|||||||
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
|
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\bibitem{Alperin_local_rep}
|
||||||
|
J.~L. Alperin.
|
||||||
|
\newblock {\em Local representation theory}, volume~11 of {\em Cambridge
|
||||||
|
Studies in Advanced Mathematics}.
|
||||||
|
\newblock Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
|
||||||
|
\newblock Modular representations as an introduction to the local
|
||||||
|
representation theory of finite groups.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\bibitem{Bleher_Camacho_Holomorphic_differentials}
|
\bibitem{Bleher_Camacho_Holomorphic_differentials}
|
||||||
F.~M. Bleher and N.~Camacho.
|
F.~M. Bleher and N.~Camacho.
|
||||||
\newblock Holomorphic differentials of {K}lein four covers.
|
\newblock Holomorphic differentials of {K}lein four covers.
|
||||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -560,9 +560,20 @@ Let $X$ be a curve with an action of $G$ and write $Y := X/H$. For any $k[C]$-mo
|
|||||||
is uniquely determined by the $k[C]$-structure of $T^1 M, \ldots, T^{p^n} M$.
|
is uniquely determined by the $k[C]$-structure of $T^1 M, \ldots, T^{p^n} M$.
|
||||||
\end{Lemma}
|
\end{Lemma}
|
||||||
\begin{proof}
|
\begin{proof}
|
||||||
This is basically \cite[proof of Theorem~1.1]{Bleher_Chinburg_Kontogeorgis_Galois_structure}. We sketch the proof for reader's convenience. Recall that if $U$ is an indecomposable $k[G]$-module
|
This is basically \cite[proof of Theorem~1.1]{Bleher_Chinburg_Kontogeorgis_Galois_structure}. We sketch the proof for reader's convenience.
|
||||||
then $U^{\sigma} := \ker(\sigma - 1)$ (the socle of $U$) is a one-dimensional
|
Assume that $G$ is a finite group with a normal cyclic $p$-Sylow subgroup $H = \langle \sigma \rangle \cong \ZZ/p^n$. Let $C := G/H$.
|
||||||
$k[C]$-module. Thus it comes from a character $\chi_U \in \wh{C} := \Hom(C, \CC)$.
|
Recall that if $U$ is an indecomposable $k[G]$-module
|
||||||
|
then $U^{\sigma} := \ker(\sigma - 1)$ (the socle of $U$) is an indecomposable
|
||||||
|
$k[C]$-module. It turns out that the map
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||||||
|
\Indec(k[G]) \to \Indec(k[C]) \times \{ 1, \ldots, p^n \}\\
|
||||||
|
U \mapsto (U^{\sigma}, \frac{\dim_k U}{\dim_k U^{\sigma}})
|
||||||
|
\end{align*}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
is a bijection (cf. \cite[p. 35--37, 42 -- 43]{Alperin_local_rep}). We write
|
||||||
|
$\mc V(M, i)$ for the $k[G]$-module corresponding to a pair $(M, i) \in \Indec(k[C]) \times \{ 1, \ldots, p^n \}$.
|
||||||
|
Thus it comes from a character $\chi_U \in \wh{C} := \Hom(C, \CC)$.
|
||||||
It turns out that the map
|
It turns out that the map
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
@ -672,7 +683,7 @@ Let $X$ be a curve with an action of $G$ and write $Y := X/H$. For any $k[C]$-mo
|
|||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
\begin{align}
|
\begin{align}
|
||||||
\mc T^1 \mc M &\cong T^1 \mc M \oplus T^2 \mc M \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-1}} \oplus \ldots \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-(p - 2)}} \label{eqn:decomposition_of_mc_T1}\\
|
\mc T^1 \mc M &\cong T^1 \mc M \oplus T^2 \mc M \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-1}} \oplus \ldots \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-(p - 2)}} \label{eqn:decomposition_of_mc_T1}\\
|
||||||
\mc T^i \mc M &\cong T^2 \mc M \oplus \ldots \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-(p-1)}} \quad \textrm{ for } 2 \le i \le p^n - p^{n-1}. \label{eqn:decomposition_of_mc_Ti}
|
\mc T^i \mc M &\cong T^2 \mc M \oplus \ldots \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-(p-1)}} \quad \textrm{ for } 2 \le i \le p^{n-1}. ???? \label{eqn:decomposition_of_mc_Ti}
|
||||||
\end{align}
|
\end{align}
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Thus, since by induction hypothesis $\mc T^i \mc M$ is determined by higher ramification data,
|
Thus, since by induction hypothesis $\mc T^i \mc M$ is determined by higher ramification data,
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user