176 lines
6.6 KiB
TeX
176 lines
6.6 KiB
TeX
\subsection{Algebraic knots}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
Suppose $F: \mathbb{C}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is a polynomial and $F(0) = 0$. Let take a small sphere $S^3$ around zero. This sphere intersect set of roots of $F$ (zero set of $F$) transversally and by the implicit function theorem the intersection is a manifold.
|
|
The dimension of sphere is $3$ and $F^{-1}(0)$ has codimension $2$.
|
|
So there is a subspace $L$ - compact one dimensional manifold without boundary.
|
|
That means that $L$ is a link in $S^3$.
|
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
|
\fontsize{40}{10}\selectfont
|
|
\centering{
|
|
\def\svgwidth{\linewidth}
|
|
\resizebox{0.2\textwidth}{!}{\input{images/milnor_singular.pdf_tex}}
|
|
}
|
|
\caption{The intersection of a sphere $S^3$ and zero set of polynomial $F$ is a link $L$.}
|
|
\label{fig:milnor_singular}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
%ref: Milnor Singular Points of Complex Hypersurfaces
|
|
\begin{theorem}
|
|
|
|
$L$ is an unknot if and only if
|
|
zero is a smooth point, i.e.
|
|
$\bigtriangledown F(0) \neq 0$ (provided $S^3$ has a sufficiently small radius).
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
Remark: if $S^3$ is large it can happen that $L$ is unlink, but $F^{-1}(0) \cap B^4$ is "complicated". \\
|
|
%Kyle M. Ormsby
|
|
\noindent
|
|
In other words: if we take sufficiently small sphere, the link is non-trivial if and only if the point $0$ is singular and the isotopy type of the link doesn't depend on the radius of the sphere.
|
|
A link obtained is such a way is called an
|
|
algebraic link (in older books on knot theory there is another notion of algebraic link with another meaning).
|
|
%ref: Eisenbud, D., Neumann, W.
|
|
\begin{example}
|
|
Let $p$ and $q$ be coprime numbers such that $p<q$ and $p,q>1$. \\
|
|
Zero is an isolated singular point ($\bigtriangledown F(0) = 0$). $F$ is quasi - homogeneous polynomial, so the isotopy class of the link doesn't depend on the choice of a sphere.
|
|
Consider $S^3 = \{ (z, w) \in \mathbb{C} : \max( \vert z \vert, \vert w \vert )\} = \varepsilon$.
|
|
The intersection
|
|
$F^{-1}(0) \cap S^3$ is a torus $T(p, q)$.
|
|
\\???????????????????
|
|
$F(z, w) = z^p - w^q$\\
|
|
.\\
|
|
$F^{-1}(0) = \{t = t^q, w = t^p\}.$ For unknot $t = \max (\vert t\vert ^p, \vert t \vert^q) = \varepsilon$.
|
|
\end{example}
|
|
as a corollary we see that $K_T^{n, }$ ???? \\
|
|
is not slice unless $m=0$. \\
|
|
$t = re^{i \Theta}, \Theta \in [0, 2\pi], r = \varepsilon^{\frac{i}{p}}$
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
|
\fontsize{40}{10}\selectfont
|
|
\centering{
|
|
\def\svgwidth{\linewidth}
|
|
\resizebox{0.2\textwidth}{!}{\input{images/polynomial_and_surface.pdf_tex}}
|
|
}
|
|
\caption{Sa.}
|
|
\label{fig:polynomial_and_surface}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
\begin{theorem}
|
|
Suppose $L$ is an algebraic link. $L = F^{-1}(0) \cap S^3$. Let
|
|
\begin{align*}
|
|
&\varphi : S^3 \setminus L \longrightarrow S^1 \\
|
|
&\varphi(z, w) =\frac{F(z, w)}{\vert F(z, w) \vert}\in S^1, \quad (z, w) \notin F^{-1}(0).
|
|
\end{align*}
|
|
The map $\varphi$ is a locally trivial fibration.
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
???????\\
|
|
$ rh D \varphi \equiv 1$
|
|
\begin{definition}
|
|
A map $\Pi : E \longrightarrow B$ is locally trivial fibration with fiber $F$ if for any $b \in B$, there is a neighbourhood $U \subset B$ such that $\Pi^{-1}(U) \cong U \times $ \\
|
|
????????????\\ $\Gamma$ ?????????????\\
|
|
FIGURES\\
|
|
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\\
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
|
|
\begin{theorem}
|
|
The map $j: \mathscr{C} \longrightarrow \mathbb{Z}^{\infty}$ is a surjection that maps ${K_n}$ to a linear independent set. Moreover $\mathscr{C} \cong \mathbb{Z}$
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
...
|
|
\\
|
|
In general $h$ is defined only up to homotopy, but this means that
|
|
\[
|
|
h_* : H_1 (F, \mathbb{Z}) \longrightarrow H_1 (F, \mathbb{Z})
|
|
\]
|
|
is well defined \\
|
|
???????????\\ map.
|
|
\begin{theorem}
|
|
\label{thm:F_as_S}
|
|
Suppose $S$ is a Seifert matrix associated with $F$ then $h = S^{-1}S^T$.
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
TO WRITE REFERENCE!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
%see Arnold Varchenko vol II
|
|
%Picard - Lefschetz formula
|
|
%Nemeth (Real Seifert forms
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
Consequences:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}[label={(\arabic*)}]
|
|
\item
|
|
the Alexander polynomial is the characteristic polynomial of $h$:
|
|
\[
|
|
\Delta_L (t) = \det (h - t I d)
|
|
\]
|
|
In particular $\Delta_L $ is monic (i.e. the top coefficient is $\pm 1$),
|
|
????????????????
|
|
\item
|
|
S is invertible,
|
|
\item
|
|
$F$ minimize the genus (i.e. $F$ is minimal genus Seifert surface).
|
|
\\??????????????????\\
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
%
|
|
\begin{definition}
|
|
A link $L$ is fibered if there exists a map ${\phi: S^3\setminus L \longrightarrow S^1}$ which is locally trivial fibration.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
If $L$ is fibered then Theorem \ref{thm:F_as_S} holds and all its consequences.
|
|
\begin{problem}
|
|
If $K_1$ and $K_2$ are fibered knots, then also $K_1 \# K_2$ is fibered.
|
|
\end{problem}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
?????????????????????\\
|
|
\begin{problem}
|
|
Prove that connected sum is well defined:\\
|
|
$\Delta_{K_1 \# K_2} =
|
|
\Delta_{K_1} + \Delta_{K_2}$ and
|
|
$g_3(K_1 \# K_2) = g_3(K_1) + g_3(K_2)$.
|
|
|
|
\end{problem}
|
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
|
\fontsize{12}{10}\selectfont
|
|
\centering{
|
|
\def\svgwidth{\linewidth}
|
|
\resizebox{1\textwidth}{!}{\input{images/satellite.pdf_tex}}}
|
|
\caption{Example for a satellite knot: a Whitehead double of a trefoil.\\
|
|
The pattern knot embedded non-trivially in an unknotted solid torus $T$ (e.i. $K \not\subset S^3\subset T$) on the left and the pattern in a companion knot - trefoil - on the right.}
|
|
\label{fig:sattelite}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
\subsection{Alternating knot}
|
|
\begin{definition}
|
|
A knot (link) is called alternating if it admits an alternating diagram.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
|
\fontsize{12}{10}\selectfont
|
|
\centering{
|
|
\def\svgwidth{\linewidth}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{figure8.png}
|
|
}
|
|
\caption{Example: figure eight knot is an alternating knot.}
|
|
\label{fig:fig8}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{definition}
|
|
A reducible crossing in a knot diagram is a crossing for which we can find a circle such that its intersection with a knot diagram is exactly that crossing. A knot diagram without reducible crossing is called reduced.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
\begin{fact}
|
|
Any reduced alternating diagram has minimal number of crossings.
|
|
\end{fact}
|
|
\begin{definition}
|
|
The writhe of the diagram is the difference between the number of positive and negative crossings.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
\begin{fact}[Tait]
|
|
Any two diagrams of the same alternating knot have the same writhe.
|
|
\end{fact}
|
|
\begin{fact}
|
|
An alternating knot has Alexander polynomial of the form:
|
|
$
|
|
a_1t^{n_1} + a_2t^{n_2} + \dots + a_s t^{n_s}
|
|
$, where $n_1 < n_2 < \dots < n_s$ and $a_ia_{i+1} < 0$.
|
|
\end{fact}
|
|
\begin{problem}[open]
|
|
What is the minimal $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$ such that if $z$ is a root of the Alexander polynomial of an alternating knot, then $\Re(z) > \alpha$.\\
|
|
Remark: alternating knots have very simple knot homologies.
|
|
\end{problem}
|
|
\begin{proposition}
|
|
If $T_{p, q}$ is a torus knot, $p < q$, then it is alternating if and only if $p=2$.
|
|
\end{proposition} |