Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
21ab15b399
commit
d700e50c09
438
README.md
438
README.md
@ -1,175 +1,75 @@
|
|||||||
## Punctuation restoration from read text
|
## Punctuation restoration from read text
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Restore punctuation marks from ASR outputs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Motivation
|
## Motivation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Speech transcripts generated by Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)
|
Speech transcripts generated by Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems typically do not contain any punctuation or capitalization. In longer stretches of automatically recognized speech, the lack of punctuation affects the general clarity of the output text [1]. The primary purpose of punctuation (PR) and capitalization restoration (CR) as a distinct natural language processing (NLP) task is to improve the legibility of ASR-generated text, and possibly other types of texts without punctuation. Aside from their intrinsic value, PR and CR may improve the performance of other NLP aspects such as Named Entity Recognition (NER), part-of-speech (POS) and semantic parsing or spoken dialog segmentation [2, 3]. As useful as it seems, It is hard to systematically evaluate PR on transcripts of conversational language; mainly because punctuation rules can be ambiguous even for originally written texts, and the very nature of naturally-occurring spoken language makes it difficult to identify clear phrase and sentence boundaries [4,5]. Given these requirements and limitations, a PR task based on a redistributable corpus of read speech was suggested. 1200 texts included in this collection (totaling over 240,000 words) were selected from two distinct sources: WikiNews and WikiTalks. Punctuation found in these sources should be approached with some reservation when used for evaluation: these are original texts and may contain some user-induced errors and bias. The texts were read out by over a hundred different speakers. Original texts with punctuation were forced-aligned with recordings and used as the ideal ASR output. The goal of the task is to provide a solution for restoring punctuation in the test set collated for this task. The test set consists of time-aligned ASR transcriptions of read texts from the two sources. Participants are encouraged to use both text-based and speech-derived features to identify punctuation symbols (e.g. multimodal framework [6]). In addition, the train set is accompanied by reference text corpora of WikiNews and WikiTalks data that can be used in training and fine-tuning punctuation models.
|
||||||
systems typically do not contain any punctuation or capitalization. In
|
|
||||||
longer stretches of automatically recognized speech, the lack of
|
|
||||||
punctuation affects the general clarity of the output text \[1\]. The
|
|
||||||
primary purpose of punctuation (PR) and capitalization restoration (CR)
|
|
||||||
as a distinct natural language processing (NLP) task is to improve the
|
|
||||||
legibility of ASR-generated text, and possibly other types of texts
|
|
||||||
without punctuation. Aside from their intrinsic value, PR and CR may
|
|
||||||
improve the performance of other NLP aspects such as Named Entity
|
|
||||||
Recognition (NER), part-of-speech (POS) and semantic parsing or spoken
|
|
||||||
dialog segmentation \[2, 3\]. As useful as it seems, It is hard to
|
|
||||||
systematically evaluate PR on transcripts of conversational language;
|
|
||||||
mainly because punctuation rules can be ambiguous even for originally
|
|
||||||
written texts, and the very nature of naturally-occurring spoken
|
|
||||||
language makes it difficult to identify clear phrase and sentence
|
|
||||||
boundaries \[4,5\]. Given these requirements and limitations, a PR task
|
|
||||||
based on a redistributable corpus of read speech was suggested. 1200
|
|
||||||
texts included in this collection (totaling over 240,000 words) were
|
|
||||||
selected from two distinct sources: WikiNews and WikiTalks. Punctuation
|
|
||||||
found in these sources should be approached with some reservation when
|
|
||||||
used for evaluation: these are original texts and may contain some
|
|
||||||
user-induced errors and bias. The texts were read out by over a hundred
|
|
||||||
different speakers. Original texts with punctuation were forced-aligned
|
|
||||||
with recordings and used as the ideal ASR output. The goal of the task
|
|
||||||
is to provide a solution for restoring punctuation in the test set
|
|
||||||
collated for this task. The test set consists of time-aligned ASR
|
|
||||||
transcriptions of read texts from the two sources. Participants are
|
|
||||||
encouraged to use both text-based and speech-derived features to
|
|
||||||
identify punctuation symbols (e.g. multimodal framework \[6\]). In
|
|
||||||
addition, the train set is accompanied by reference text corpora of
|
|
||||||
WikiNews and WikiTalks data that can be used in training and fine-tuning
|
|
||||||
punctuation models.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Task description
|
## Task description
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The purpose of this task is to restore punctuation in the ASR
|
The purpose of this task is to restore punctuation in the ASR recognition of texts read out loud.
|
||||||
recognition of texts read out loud.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{width="6.267716535433071in"
|
|
||||||
height="7.402777777777778in"}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Dataset -- WikiPunct
|
## Dataset – WikiPunct
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
WikiPunct is a crowdsourced text and audio data set of Polish Wikipedia
|
WikiPunct is a crowdsourced text and audio data set of Polish Wikipedia pages read out loud by Polish lectors. The dataset is divided into two parts:conversational(WikiTalks)and information (WikiNews). Over a hundred people were involved in the production of the audio component. The total length of audio data reaches almost thirty-six hours, including the test set. Steps were taken to balance the male-to-female ratio.
|
||||||
pages read out loud by Polish lectors. The dataset is divided into two
|
|
||||||
parts: conversational (WikiTalks) and information (WikiNews). Over a
|
|
||||||
hundred people were involved in the production of the audio component.
|
|
||||||
The total length of audio data reaches almost thirty-six hours,
|
|
||||||
including the test set. Steps were taken to balance the male-to-female
|
|
||||||
ratio.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
WikiPunct has over thirty-two thousand texts and 1200 audio files, one
|
WikiPuncthas over thirty-two thousand texts and 1200 audio files, one thousand in the training set and two hundred in the test set. There is a transcript of automatically recognized speech and force-aligned text for each text. The details behind the data format and evaluation metrics are presented below in the respective sections.
|
||||||
thousand in the training set and two hundred in the test set. There is a
|
|
||||||
transcript of automatically recognized speech and force-aligned text for
|
|
||||||
each text. The details behind the data format and evaluation metrics are
|
|
||||||
presented below in the respective sections.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Statistics:**
|
**Statistics:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Text:**
|
- **Text:**
|
||||||
|
- ver thirty-two thousand texts; WikiNews ca. 15,000, WikiTalks ca. 17,000;
|
||||||
- over thirty-two thousand texts; WikiNews ca. 15,000, WikiTalks
|
- **Audio:**
|
||||||
> ca. 17,000;
|
- Selection procedure:
|
||||||
|
- randomly selected WikiNews (80% that is equal 800 entries for the training set) with the word count above 150 words and smaller than 300 words;
|
||||||
- **Audio:**
|
- randomly selected WikiTalks (20%) with word the count above 150 words but smaller than 300 words and at least one question mark
|
||||||
|
- Data set split
|
||||||
- Selection procedure:
|
- Training data: 1000 recordings
|
||||||
|
- Test data: at 274 recordings
|
||||||
- randomly selected WikiNews (80% that is equal 800 entries
|
- Speakers:
|
||||||
> for the training set) with the word count above 150 words
|
- Polish male: 51 speakers, 16.7 hours of speech
|
||||||
> and smaller than 300 words;
|
- Polish female: 54 speakers, 19 hours of speech
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- randomly selected WikiTalks (20%) with word the count above
|
|
||||||
> 150 words but smaller than 300 words and at least one
|
|
||||||
> question mark
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Data set split
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Training data: 1000 recordings
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Test data: at 274 recordings
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Speakers:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Polish male: 51 speakers, 16.7 hours of speech
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Polish female: 54 speakers, 19 hours of speech
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Punctuation for raw text:**
|
**Punctuation for raw text:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**symbol** **mean** **median** **max** **sum** **included**
|
| | **symbol** | **mean** | **median** | **max** | **sum** | **included** |
|
||||||
---------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ --------- ----------- --------------
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
**fullstop** . 12.44 7.0 1129.0 404 378 yes
|
| **fullstop** | . | 12.44 | 7.0 | 1129.0 | 404 378 | yes |
|
||||||
**comma** , 10.97 5.0 1283.0 356 678 yes
|
| **comma** | , | 10.97 | 5.0 | 1283.0 | 356 678 | yes |
|
||||||
**question_mark** ? 0.83 0.0 130.0 26 879 yes
|
| **question\_mark** | ? | 0.83 | 0.0 | 130.0 | 26 879 | yes |
|
||||||
**exclamation_mark** ! 0.22 0.0 55.0 7 164 yes
|
| **exclamation\_mark** | ! | 0.22 | 0.0 | 55.0 | 7 164 | yes |
|
||||||
**hyphen** \- 2.64 1.0 363.0 81 190 yes
|
| **hyphen** | - | 2.64 | 1.0 | 363.0 | 81 190 | yes |
|
||||||
**colon** : 1.49 0.0 202.0 44 995 yes
|
| **colon** | : | 1.49 | 0.0 | 202.0 | 44 995 | yes |
|
||||||
**ellipsis** \... 0.27 0.0 60.0 8 882 yes
|
| **ellipsis** | ... | 0.27 | 0.0 | 60.0 | 8 882 | yes |
|
||||||
**semicolon** ; 0.13 0.0 51.0 4 270 no
|
| **semicolon** | ; | 0.13 | 0.0 | 51.0 | 4 270 | no |
|
||||||
**quote** " 3.64 0.0 346.0 116 874 no
|
| **quote** | " | 3.64 | 0.0 | 346.0 | 116 874 | no |
|
||||||
**words** 169.50 89.0 17252.0 5 452 032 \-
|
| **words** | | 169.50 | 89.0 | 17252.0 | 5 452 032 | - |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The dataset is divided into two parts: conversational (WikiTalks) and
|
The dataset is divided into two parts: conversational (WikiTalks) and information (WikiNews).
|
||||||
information (WikiNews).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Part 1. WikiTalks**
|
**Part 1. WikiTalks**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Data scraped from Polish Wikipedia Talk pages. Talk pages, also known as
|
Data scraped from Polish Wikipedia Talk pages. Talk pages, also known as discussion pages, are administration pages with editorial details and discussions for Wikipedia articles.. Talk pages were scrapped from the web using a list of article titles shared alongside Wikipedia dump archives.
|
||||||
discussion pages, are administration pages with editorial details and
|
|
||||||
discussions for Wikipedia articles.. Talk pages were scrapped from the
|
|
||||||
web using a list of article titles shared alongside Wikipedia dump
|
|
||||||
archives.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Wikipedia Talk pages serve as conversational data. Here, users
|
Wikipedia Talk pages serve as conversational data. Here, users communicate with each other by writing comments. Vocabulary and punctuation errors are expected. This data set covers 20% of the spoken data.
|
||||||
communicate with each other by writing comments. Vocabulary and
|
|
||||||
punctuation errors are expected. This data set covers 20% of the spoken
|
|
||||||
data.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Example:
|
Example:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **wikitalks001948:** Cóż za bzdury tu powypisywane! Fra Diavolo
|
- **wikitalks001948:** Cóż za bzdury tu powypisywane! Fra Diavolo starał się nie dopuścić do upadku Republiki Partenopejskiej? Kto to wymyślił?! Człowiek ten był jednym z najżarliwszych wrogów francuskiej okupacji, a za zasługi w wypędzeniu Francuzów został mianowany pułkownikiem w królewskiej armii z prawdziwie królewską pensją. Bez niego wyzwolenie, nazywać to tak czy też nie, północnej części królestwa byłoby dużo trudniejsze, bo dysponował siłą kilku tysięcy sprawnych w boju i umiejętnie wziętych w karby rzezimieszków. Toteż armia Burbonów nie pokonywała go, jak to się twierdzi w artykule, lecz ściśle współpracowała. Redaktorów zachęcam do jak najszybszej korekty artykułu, bo aktualnie jest obrazą dla ambicji Wikipedii. 91.199.250.17
|
||||||
> starał się nie dopuścić do upadku Republiki Partenopejskiej? Kto
|
- **wikitalks008902:** Stare wątki w dyskusji przeniosłem do archiwum. Od prawie roku dyskusja w nich nie była kontynuowana. Sławek Borewicz
|
||||||
> to wymyślił?! Człowiek ten był jednym z najżarliwszych wrogów
|
|
||||||
> francuskiej okupacji, a za zasługi w wypędzeniu Francuzów został
|
|
||||||
> mianowany pułkownikiem w królewskiej armii z prawdziwie królewską
|
|
||||||
> pensją. Bez niego wyzwolenie, nazywać to tak czy też nie,
|
|
||||||
> północnej części królestwa byłoby dużo trudniejsze, bo dysponował
|
|
||||||
> siłą kilku tysięcy sprawnych w boju i umiejętnie wziętych w karby
|
|
||||||
> rzezimieszków. Toteż armia Burbonów nie pokonywała go, jak to się
|
|
||||||
> twierdzi w artykule, lecz ściśle współpracowała. Redaktorów
|
|
||||||
> zachęcam do jak najszybszej korekty artykułu, bo aktualnie jest
|
|
||||||
> obrazą dla ambicji Wikipedii. 91.199.250.17
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **wikitalks008902:** Stare wątki w dyskusji przeniosłem do archiwum.
|
|
||||||
> Od prawie roku dyskusja w nich nie była kontynuowana. Sławek
|
|
||||||
> Borewicz
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Part 2. WikiNews**
|
**Part 2. WikiNews**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Wikinews** is a free-content news wiki and a project of the Wikimedia
|
**Wikinews** is a free-content news wiki and a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. The site works through collaborative journalism. The data was scraped directly from wikinews dump archive. The overall text quality is high, but vocabulary and punctuation errors may occur. This data set covers 80% of the spoken data.
|
||||||
Foundation. The site works through collaborative journalism. The data
|
|
||||||
was scraped directly from wikinews dump archive. The overall text
|
|
||||||
quality is high, but vocabulary and punctuation errors may occur. This
|
|
||||||
data set covers 80% of the spoken data.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Example:
|
Example:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **wikinews222361:** Misja STS-127 promu kosmicznego Endeavour do
|
- **wikinews222361:** Misja STS-127 promu kosmicznego Endeavour do Międzynarodowej Stacji Kosmicznej została przełożona ze względu na wyciek wodoru. Podczas procesu napełniania zewnętrznego zbiornika paliwem, część ciekłego wodoru przemieniła się w gaz i przedostała się do systemu odpowietrzania. System ten jest używany do bezpiecznego odprowadzania nadmiaru wodoru z platformy startowej 39A do Centrum Lotów Kosmicznych imienia Johna F. Kennedy'ego. Początek misji miał mieć miejsce dzisiaj, o godzinie 13:17. Ze względu jednak na awarię, najbliższa możliwa data startu wahadłowca to środa 17 czerwca, jednak na ten dzień NASA na Przylądku Canaveral zaplanowana wystrzelenie sondy kosmicznej Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Misja może być zatem opóźniona do 20 czerwca, który jest ostatnią możliwą datą startu w tym miesiącu. W niedzielę odbędzie się spotkanie specjalistów NASA, na którym zostanie ustalona nowa data startu i dalszy plan misji STS-127.
|
||||||
> Międzynarodowej Stacji Kosmicznej została przełożona ze względu na
|
|
||||||
> wyciek wodoru. Podczas procesu napełniania zewnętrznego zbiornika
|
|
||||||
> paliwem, część ciekłego wodoru przemieniła się w gaz i przedostała
|
|
||||||
> się do systemu odpowietrzania. System ten jest używany do
|
|
||||||
> bezpiecznego odprowadzania nadmiaru wodoru z platformy startowej
|
|
||||||
> 39A do Centrum Lotów Kosmicznych imienia Johna F. Kennedy\'ego.
|
|
||||||
> Początek misji miał mieć miejsce dzisiaj, o godzinie 13:17. Ze
|
|
||||||
> względu jednak na awarię, najbliższa możliwa data startu
|
|
||||||
> wahadłowca to środa 17 czerwca, jednak na ten dzień NASA na
|
|
||||||
> Przylądku Canaveral zaplanowana wystrzelenie sondy kosmicznej
|
|
||||||
> Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Misja może być zatem opóźniona do 20
|
|
||||||
> czerwca, który jest ostatnią możliwą datą startu w tym miesiącu. W
|
|
||||||
> niedzielę odbędzie się spotkanie specjalistów NASA, na którym
|
|
||||||
> zostanie ustalona nowa data startu i dalszy plan misji STS-127.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Data format
|
## Data format
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Input is a TSV file with two columns:
|
Input is a TSV file with two columns:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Text ID (to be used when handling forced-aligned transcriptions and WAV files if needed)
|
1. Text ID (to be used when handling forced-aligned transcriptions and WAV files if needed)
|
||||||
@ -180,22 +80,13 @@ the text with punctuation marks should be given.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Forced-aligned transcriptions
|
### Forced-aligned transcriptions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We use force-aligned transcriptions of the original texts to approximate
|
We use force-aligned transcriptions of the original texts to approximate ASR output. Files in the _.clntmstmp_ format contain forced-alignment of the original text together with the audio file read out by a group of volunteers. The files may contain errors resulting from incorrect reading of the text (skipping fragments, adding words missing from the original text) and alignment errors resulting from the configuration of the alignment tool for text and audio files. The configuration targeted Polish; names from foreign languages may be poorly recognised, with the word duration equal to zero (start and end timestamps are equal). Data is given in the following format:
|
||||||
ASR output. Files in the *.clntmstmp* format contain forced-alignment of
|
|
||||||
the original text together with the audio file read out by a group of
|
|
||||||
volunteers. The files may contain errors resulting from incorrect
|
|
||||||
reading of the text (skipping fragments, adding words missing from the
|
|
||||||
original text) and alignment errors resulting from the configuration of
|
|
||||||
the alignment tool for text and audio files. The configuration targeted
|
|
||||||
Polish; names from foreign languages may be poorly recognised, with the
|
|
||||||
word duration equal to zero (start and end timestamps are equal). Data
|
|
||||||
is given in the following format:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> **(timestamp_start,timestamp_end) word**
|
**(timestamp\_start,timestamp\_end) word**
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> **...**
|
...
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> **\</s\>**
|
**\</s\>**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
where **\</s\>** is a symbol of the end of recognition.
|
where **\</s\>** is a symbol of the end of recognition.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -203,75 +94,75 @@ Example:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
(990,1200) Rosja
|
(990,1200) Rosja
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> (1230,1500) zaczyna
|
(1230,1500) zaczyna
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (1590,1950) powracać
|
(1590,1950) powracać
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (1980,2040) do
|
(1980,2040) do
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (2070,2400) praktyk
|
(2070,2400) praktyk
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (2430,2490) z
|
(2430,2490) z
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (2520,2760) czasów
|
(2520,2760) czasów
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (2820,3090) zimnej
|
(2820,3090) zimnej
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (3180,3180) wojny.
|
(3180,3180) wojny.
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (3960,4290) Rosjanie
|
(3960,4290) Rosjanie
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (4380,4770) wznowili
|
(4380,4770) wznowili
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (4860,5070) bowiem
|
(4860,5070) bowiem
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (5100,5160) na
|
(5100,5160) na
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (5220,5430) stałe
|
(5220,5430) stałe
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (5520,5670) loty
|
(5520,5670) loty
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (5760,6030) swoich
|
(5760,6030) swoich
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (6120,6600) bombowców
|
(6120,6600) bombowców
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (6630,7230) strategicznych
|
(6630,7230) strategicznych
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (7350,7530) poza
|
(7350,7530) poza
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (7590,7890) granice
|
(7590,7890) granice
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (8010,8010) kraju.
|
(8010,8010) kraju.
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (8880,9300) Prezydent
|
(8880,9300) Prezydent
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (9360,9810) Władimir
|
(9360,9810) Władimir
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (9930,10200) Putin
|
(9930,10200) Putin
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (10650,10650) wyjaśnił,
|
(10650,10650) wyjaśnił,
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (10830,10920) iż
|
(10830,10920) iż
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (10980,11130) jest
|
(10980,11130) jest
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (11160,11190) to
|
(11160,11190) to
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (11220,11520) odpowiedź
|
(11220,11520) odpowiedź
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (11550,11640) na
|
(11550,11640) na
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (11670,12120) zagrożenie
|
(11670,12120) zagrożenie
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (12240,12300) ze
|
(12240,12300) ze
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (12330,12570) strony
|
(12330,12570) strony
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (12660,12870) innych
|
(12660,12870) innych
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> (13140,13140) państw.
|
(13140,13140) państw.
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> \</s\>
|
\</s\>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Evaluation procedure
|
## Evaluation procedure
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -281,90 +172,55 @@ Baseline results will be provided in final evaluation.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
During the task the following punctuation marks will be evaluated:
|
During the task the following punctuation marks will be evaluated:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Punctuation mark** **symbol**
|
| **Punctuation mark** | **symbol** |
|
||||||
------------------------ ------------
|
| --- | --- |
|
||||||
fullstop .
|
| fullstop | . |
|
||||||
comma ,
|
| comma | , |
|
||||||
question mark ?
|
| question mark | ? |
|
||||||
exclamation mark !
|
| exclamation mark | ! |
|
||||||
hyphen \-
|
| hyphen | - |
|
||||||
colon :
|
| colon | : |
|
||||||
ellipsis \...
|
| ellipsis | ... |
|
||||||
blank (no punctuation)
|
| blank (no punctuation) | |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Submission format
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The output to be evaluated is just the text with punctuation marks added.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Metrics
|
### Metrics
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Final results are evaluated in terms of precision, recall, and F1 scores
|
Final results are evaluated in terms of precision, recall, and F1 scores for predicting each punctuation mark separately. Submissions are compared with respect to the weighted average of F1 scores for each punctuation sign.
|
||||||
for predicting each punctuation mark separately. Submissions are
|
|
||||||
compared with respect to the weighted average of F1 scores for each
|
|
||||||
punctuation sign.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
##### Per-document score:
|
##### Per-document score:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
$Precision\ = \ \frac{\text{TP}}{TP\ + \ FP}$$;\ Recall\ = \ \frac{\text{TP}}{TP\ + \ FN}$${;\ F}_{1}\ = \ 2\ *\ \frac{Precision\ *\ Recall}{Precision\ + \ Recall}$
|
##### Global score per punctuation sign _p_:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
##### Global score per punctuation sign *p*:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
$P_{p}\ = avg_{\text{micro}}Precision(p)\ = \frac{\text{TP}}{TP + FP}\text{\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }R_{p} = avg_{\text{micro}}Recall(p)\ = \frac{\text{TP}}{TP + FN}\ $
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Final scoring metric calculated as weighted average of global scores per
|
Final scoring metric calculated as weighted average of global scores per
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
$\frac{1}{N}support(p)\ *\ avg_{\text{micro}}F_{1}(p)$
|
We would like to invite participants to discussion about evaluation metrics, taking into account such factors as:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We would like to invite participants to discussion about evaluation
|
- ASR and Forced-Alignment errors,
|
||||||
metrics, taking into account such factors as:
|
- inconsistencies among annotators,
|
||||||
|
- impact of only slight displacement of punctuation,
|
||||||
- ASR and Forced-Alignment errors,
|
- assigning different weights to different types of errors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- inconsistencies among annotators,
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- impact of only slight displacement of punctuation,
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- assigning different weights to different types of errors.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Downloads
|
### Downloads
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Data can be downloaded from Google Drive. Below is a list of file names
|
Data can be downloaded from Google Drive. Below is a list of file names along with a description of what they contain.
|
||||||
along with a description of what they contain.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- poleval_fa.train.tar.gz - archive contain forced-alignment of the
|
- poleval\_fa.train.tar.gz - archive contain forced-alignment of the original text together with the audio file
|
||||||
> original text together with the audio file
|
- poleval\_text.train.tar.gz - archive contain original text in provided JSON format and CSV corresponding to audio files
|
||||||
|
- poleval\_text.rest.tar.gz - archive contain original text in provided JSON format and CSV for which no audio files were provided
|
||||||
- poleval_text.train.tar.gz - archive contain original text in
|
- poleval\_wav.train.tar.gz - archive contain audio files
|
||||||
> provided JSON format and CSV corresponding to audio files
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- poleval_text.rest.tar.gz - archive contain original text in provided
|
|
||||||
> JSON format and CSV for which no audio files were provided
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- poleval_wav.train.tar.gz - archive contain audio files
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### References
|
### References
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Yi, J., Tao, J., Bai, Y., Tian, Z., & Fan, C. (2020). Adversarial
|
1. Yi, J., Tao, J., Bai, Y., Tian, Z., & Fan, C. (2020). Adversarial transfer learning for punctuation restoration. _arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00248_.
|
||||||
> transfer learning for punctuation restoration. *arXiv preprint
|
2. Nguyen, Thai Binh, et al. "Improving Vietnamese Named Entity Recognition from Speech Using Word Capitalization and Punctuation Recovery Models." _Proc. Interspeech 2020_ (2020): 4263-4267.
|
||||||
> arXiv:2004.00248*.
|
3. Hlubík, Pavel, et al. "Inserting Punctuation to ASR Output in a Real-Time Production Environment." _International Conference on Text, Speech, and Dialogue_. Springer, Cham, 2020.
|
||||||
|
4. Sirts, Kairit, and Kairit Peekman. "Evaluating Sentence Segmentation and Word Tokenization Systems on Estonian Web Texts." _Human Language Technologies–The Baltic Perspective: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference Baltic HLT 2020_. Vol. 328. IOS Press, 2020.
|
||||||
2. Nguyen, Thai Binh, et al. \"Improving Vietnamese Named Entity
|
5. Wang, Xueyujie. "Analysis of Sentence Boundary of the Host's Spoken Language Based on Semantic Orientation Pointwise Mutual Information Algorithm." _2020 12th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA)_. IEEE, 2020.
|
||||||
> Recognition from Speech Using Word Capitalization and Punctuation
|
6. Sunkara, Monica, et al. "Multimodal Semi-supervised Learning Framework for Punctuation Prediction in Conversational Speech." _arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.00702_ (2020).
|
||||||
> Recovery Models.\" *Proc. Interspeech 2020* (2020): 4263-4267.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. Hlubík, Pavel, et al. \"Inserting Punctuation to ASR Output in a
|
|
||||||
> Real-Time Production Environment.\" *International Conference on
|
|
||||||
> Text, Speech, and Dialogue*. Springer, Cham, 2020.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. Sirts, Kairit, and Kairit Peekman. \"Evaluating Sentence
|
|
||||||
> Segmentation and Word Tokenization Systems on Estonian Web
|
|
||||||
> Texts.\" *Human Language Technologies--The Baltic Perspective:
|
|
||||||
> Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference Baltic HLT
|
|
||||||
> 2020*. Vol. 328. IOS Press, 2020.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
5. Wang, Xueyujie. \"Analysis of Sentence Boundary of the Host\'s
|
|
||||||
> Spoken Language Based on Semantic Orientation Pointwise Mutual
|
|
||||||
> Information Algorithm.\" *2020 12th International Conference on
|
|
||||||
> Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA)*.
|
|
||||||
> IEEE, 2020.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
6. Sunkara, Monica, et al. \"Multimodal Semi-supervised Learning
|
|
||||||
> Framework for Punctuation Prediction in Conversational Speech.\"
|
|
||||||
> *arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.00702* (2020).
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user