Fixed problem with KeyError

dev-0/out.tsv

@@ -58,115 +58,6 @@ P
 P
 S
 P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-S
-P
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
 S
 P
 S

test-A/out.tsv

@@ -58,115 +58,6 @@ P
 P
 S
 P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-S
-P
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-P
-P
-S
-P
-S
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-S
-S
-S
-P
-P
-P
-P
 S
 P
 S

train/in.tsv

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Yeah, it does seem that way. I match a lot of it, mind you, but his generalizati
 Yeah, calling homosexuals reprobates isn't exactly unbiased. Also, it looks like she might be assuming pedophiles that abuse boys to be homosexual, even if they are often heterosexual in their adult sexual relationships. "Homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia may even be mutually exclusive", according to an (admittedly older) study from 1978 (Link: http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/lgpstgenerally.html).	1262360115
 Symptom 1:  They want to alter the usage of words.  An example is the objections to "denier" at /r/climateskeptics.  The objection is that it makes an implicit comparison to Holocaust Deniers.  To support this, they have a few quotations from some people who have made the comparison explicit. Those quotations are almost always delivered out of context by influential deniers.  The result is that when a conditioned person hears someone say "Denier" they mentally add "Holocaust" themselves.  It's a simple form of linguistic conditioning- it alters the meanings of words intentionally in order to provoke feelings of humiliation, and thus anger, and thus increased support for the anti-science crusade. \n\nSymptom 2:  Congregation in a Closed Forum. Supporters of the idea punish, to the extent that they are able, dissent, and seek forums where they outnumber dissenters by a great margin.  (This generally has to occur in conjunction with at least one other symptom.  Dissent from the idea that AIDS is caused by HIV isn't useful to a discussion, and downvoting a redditor who seeks to argue this isn't evidence of a closed forum.)\n\nSymptom 3:  Thin sourcing. If more than 75% of their evidence and research are contained in less than 10 forums, it's likely BS.	1340251421
 I got that many times. Last time I had it, I got very annoyed and started yelling and cursing at the back of my head.	1342038905
-I think the problem isn't that people find it so hard to believe that aliens might visit earth, it's that they find it hard to believe it would go down like most alien encounter ufo stories describe it. \n\nThe technology required to travel across the galaxy is staggering. Even if it is possible to do in less than several hundred years which it might not be) we are at least a few centuries away from possessing such technology. And with the exponential rate at which technology increases any civilization that possessed it would be technically as far above us as we would be stone age humans. Maybe even more. \n\nWould a civilization that advanced travel all the way to earth, expending vast amounts of energy, just to perform low tech medical experiments on people and fuck with rural farmers? What would be the purpose? It would be like mounting an expedition to Antarctica just kidnap a few penguins draw in the snow, and then leave. \n\nThat's what I think of it anyway. I think there must almost certainly be other sentient species within our own galaxy. It borders on mathematical impossibility for there not to be. However I'm equally certain they've never visited earth. 	1348695010
+I think the problem isn't that people find it so hard to believe that aliens might visit earth, it's that they find it hard to believe it would go down like most alien encounter/ufo stories describe it. \n\nThe technology required to travel across the galaxy is staggering. Even if it is possible to do in less than several hundred years(which it might not be) we are at least a few centuries away from possessing such technology. And with the exponential rate at which technology increases any civilization that possessed it would be technically as far above us as we would be stone age humans. Maybe even more. \n\nWould a civilization that advanced travel all the way to earth, expending vast amounts of energy, just to perform low tech medical experiments on people and fuck with rural farmers? What would be the purpose? It would be like mounting an expedition to Antarctica just kidnap a few penguins, draw in the snow, and then leave. \n\nThat's what I think of it anyway. I think there must almost certainly be other sentient species within our own galaxy. It borders on mathematical impossibility for there not to be. However I'm equally certain they've never visited earth. 	1348695010
 Sure, whatever colour. That's not the important bit!	1332605344
 > skeptical thinking\n\nHe is not spreading skeptical thinking. It's like going to a personal trainer who is 50 pounds overweight. Lol.  \n\nIf he were an English teacher, meh. \n\n[As always, relevant xkcd](http://xkcd.com/154/)\n\n	1347256897
 Honestly, if saying that would strain the relationship, then it isn't much of one in the first place. 	1295153676