de_rham_cyclic/article_de_rham_cyclic.tex

431 lines
14 KiB
TeX
Raw Normal View History

2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
% !TeX spellcheck = en_GB
\RequirePackage[l2tabu, orthodox]{nag}
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{amsart}
%\usepackage[margin=32mm,bottom=40mm]{geometry}
%\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.1}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage[charter]{mathdesign}
\let\circledS\undefined
%
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{tikz, tikz-cd, stmaryrd, amsmath, amsthm, amssymb,
hyperref, bbm, mathtools, mathrsfs}
%\usepackage{upgreek}
\newcommand{\upomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}
\newcommand{\upeta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}
\newcommand{\dd}{\boldsymbol{d}}
\usepackage[shortlabels]{enumitem}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows}
\usetikzlibrary{positioning}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
% \usepackage[MeX]{polski}
\newcommand{\bb}{\textbf}
\newcommand{\uu}{\underline}
\newcommand{\ol}{\overline}
\newcommand{\mc}{\mathcal}
\newcommand{\wh}{\widehat}
\newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}
\newcommand{\mf}{\mathfrak}
\newcommand{\ms}{\mathscr}
\renewcommand{\AA}{\mathbb{A}}
\newcommand{\II}{\mathbb{I}}
\newcommand{\HH}{\mathbb{H}}
\newcommand{\ZZ}{\mathbb{Z}}
\newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\PP}{\mathbb{P}}
\newcommand{\QQ}{\mathbb{Q}}
\newcommand{\LL}{\mathbb{L}}
\newcommand{\NN}{\mathbb{N}}
\newcommand{\FF}{\mathbb{F}}
\newcommand{\VV}{\mathbb{V}}
\newcommand{\ddeg}{\textbf{deg}\,}
\DeclareMathOperator{\SSh}{-Sh}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Ind}{Ind}
\DeclareMathOperator{\pr}{pr}
\DeclareMathOperator{\tr}{tr}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Sh}{Sh}
\DeclareMathOperator{\diag}{diag}
\DeclareMathOperator{\sgn}{sgn}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Divv}{Div}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Coind}{Coind}
\DeclareMathOperator{\coker}{coker}
\DeclareMathOperator{\im}{im}
\DeclareMathOperator{\id}{id}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Tot}{Tot}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Span}{Span}
\DeclareMathOperator{\res}{res}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Gl}{Gl}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Sl}{Sl}
\DeclareMathOperator{\GCD}{GCD}
\DeclareMathOperator{\ord}{ord}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Spec}{Spec}
\DeclareMathOperator{\rank}{rank}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Gal}{Gal}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Proj}{Proj}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Ext}{Ext}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Hom}{Hom}
\DeclareMathOperator{\End}{End}
\DeclareMathOperator{\cha}{char}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Cl}{Cl}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Jac}{Jac}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Lie}{Lie}
\DeclareMathOperator{\GSp}{GSp}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Sp}{Sp}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Sym}{Sym}
\DeclareMathOperator{\qlog}{qlog}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Aut}{Aut}
\DeclareMathOperator{\divv}{div}
\DeclareMathOperator{\mmod}{-mod}
\DeclareMathOperator{\ev}{ev}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Indec}{Indec}
\DeclareMathOperator{\pole}{pole}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{Theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem*{mainthm}{Main Theorem}
\newtheorem{Remark}[Theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{Lemma}[Theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{Corollary}[Theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{Conjecture}[Theorem]{Conjecture}
\newtheorem{Proposition}[Theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{Setup}[Theorem]{Setup}
\newtheorem{Example}[Theorem]{Example}
\newtheorem{manualtheoreminner}{Theorem}
\newenvironment{manualtheorem}[1]{%
\renewcommand\themanualtheoreminner{#1}%
\manualtheoreminner
}{\endmanualtheoreminner}
\newtheorem{Question}[Theorem]{Question}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{Definition}[Theorem]{Definition}
%\theoremstyle{remark}
\renewcommand{\thetable}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{Theorem}}
%\usepackage{refcheck}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\hyphenation{Woj-ciech}
%opening
\begin{document}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\title[The de Rham...]{?? The de Rham cohomology of covers\\ with cyclic $p$-Sylow subgroup}
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
\author[A. Kontogeorgis and J. Garnek]{Aristides Kontogeorgis and J\k{e}drzej Garnek}
\address{???}
\email{jgarnek@amu.edu.pl}
\subjclass[2020]{Primary 14G17, Secondary 14H30, 20C20}
\keywords{de~Rham cohomology, algebraic curves, group actions,
characteristic~$p$}
\urladdr{http://jgarnek.faculty.wmi.amu.edu.pl/}
\date{}
\begin{abstract}
????
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
\bibliographystyle{plain}
%
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\section{Introduction}
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
%
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\begin{mainthm}
Suppose that $G$ is a group with a $p$-cyclic Sylow subgroup.
Let $X$ be a curve with an action of~$G$ over a field $k$ of characteristic $p$.
The $k[G]$-module structure of $H^1_{dR}(X)$ is uniquely determined by the lower ramification groups and the fundamental characters of closed
points $x$ of $X$ that are ramified in the cover $X \to X/G$.
\end{mainthm}
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
\section{Cyclic covers}
%
2024-10-17 14:40:28 +02:00
Let for any $\ZZ/p^n$-cover $X \to Y$
%
\begin{align*}
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
u_{X/Y, P}^{(t)} &:= \min \{ t \ge 0 : G_P^{(t)} \cong \ZZ/p^{n-t} \},\\
l_{X/Y, P}^{(t)} &:= \min \{ t \ge 0 : G_{P, t} \cong \ZZ/p^{n-t} \}.
2024-10-17 14:40:28 +02:00
\end{align*}
%
Note that if $G_P = \ZZ/p^n$, this coincides with the standard definition of
the $t$th upper (resp. lower) ramification jump of $X \to Y$ at $P$.
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\begin{Theorem} \label{thm:cyclic_de_rham}
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
Suppose that $\pi : X \to Y$ is a $\ZZ/p^n$-cover. Let $\langle G_P : P \in X(k) \rangle = \ZZ/p^m = G_{P_0}$ for $P_0 \in X(k)$. Then, as $k[\ZZ/p^n]$-modules:
%
\[
H^1_{dR}(X) \cong J_{p^n}^{2 (g_Y - 1)} \oplus J_{p^n - p^{n-m} + 1}^2 \oplus \bigoplus_{P \neq P_0} J_{p^n - \frac{p^n}{e_{X/Y, P}}}^2
\oplus \bigoplus_P \bigoplus_{t = 0}^{n-1} J_{p^n - p^t}^{u_{X/Y, P}^{(t+1)} - u_{X/Y, P}^{(t)}}.
\]
\end{Theorem}
%
Write $H := \ZZ/p^n = \langle \sigma \rangle$.
For any $k[H]$-module $M$ denote:
%
\begin{align*}
M^{(i)} &:= \ker ((\sigma - 1)^i : M \to M),\\
T^i M &= T^i_H M := M^{(i)}/M^{(i-1)} \quad \textrm{ for } i = 1, \ldots, p^n.
\end{align*}
%
Recall that $\dim_k T^i M$ determines the structure of $M$ completely (cf. ????).
In the inductive step we use also the group $\ZZ/p^{n-1}$. In this case
we denote the irreducible $k[\ZZ/p^{n-1}]$-modules by $\mc J_1, \ldots, \mc J_{p^{n-1}}$
and $\mc T^i M := T^i_{\ZZ/p^{n-1}} M$ for any $k[\ZZ/p^{n-1}]$-module $M$.
2024-10-17 14:40:28 +02:00
Note also that for $j \ge 1$:
%
\[
l_{X/Y, P}^{(j)} - l_{X/Y, P}^{(j-1)} = \frac{1}{p^{j-1}} (u_{X/Y, P}^{(j)} - u^{(j-1)}_{X/Y, P})
\]
%
(in particular, $u_{X/Y, P}^{(1)} = l_{X/Y, P}^{(1)}$). Moreover, if $X' \to Y$ is the $\ZZ/p^N$-subcover of $X \to Y$ for $N \le n$ then:
%
\begin{itemize}
\item $u_{X'/Y, P}^{(t)} = u_{X'/Y, P}^{(t)}$ for $t \le N$,
\item $l_{X/X', P}^{(t)} = l_{X/X', P}^{(t + N)}$ for $t \le n-N$.
\end{itemize}
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\begin{Lemma} \label{lem:G_invariants_etale}
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
If the $G$-cover $X \to Y$ is \'{e}tale, then the natural map
%
\[
H^1_{dR}(Y) \to H^1_{dR}(X)^G
\]
%
is an isomorphism.
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
????
\end{proof}
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\begin{Lemma} \label{lem:trace_surjective}
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
If the $G$-cover $X \to Y$ is totally ramified, then the map
%
\[
\tr_{X/Y} : H^1_{dR}(X) \to H^1_{dR}(Y)
\]
%
is an epimorphism.
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
????
\end{proof}
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\begin{Lemma} \label{lem:TiM_isomorphism}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
For any $i \le p^n - 1$:
%
\[
(\sigma - 1) : T^{i+1} M \hookrightarrow T^i M.
\]
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
\end{proof}
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\begin{Lemma}
Let $M$ be a $k[H]$-module. Let $T^i M$ be as above and
$\mc T^i M := T^i_{H'} M$ for $H' \le H$, $H' \cong \ZZ/p^{n-1}$.
If $\mc T^i M \cong \mc T^{i+1} M$ for some $i$ then:
%
\[
T^{pi + p} M \cong T^{pi + p - 1} M \cong \ldots \cong T^{pi - p + 1} M.
\]
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
??
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:cyclic_de_rham}]
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
We use the following notation: $H' := \langle \sigma^p \rangle \cong \ZZ/p^{n-1}$,
$H'' := H/\langle \sigma^{p^{n-1}} \rangle \cong \ZZ/p^{n-1}$, $Y' := X/H'$, $X'' := X/H''$.
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
Write also $\mc M := H^1_{dR}(X)$.
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
By induction hypothesis for $H'$ acting on $X$, we have the following isomorphism of $k[H']$-modules:
%
\[
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\mc M \cong \mc J_{p^{n-1}}^{2 (g_{Y'} - 1)} \oplus \mc J_{p^{n-1} - p^{n - 1 -m'} + 1}^2 \oplus \bigoplus_{P \neq P_0} \mc J_{p^n - \frac{p^{n-1}}{e_{X/Y', P}}}^2
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
\oplus \bigoplus_P \bigoplus_{t = 0}^{n-1} \mc J_{p^n - p^t}^{u_{X/Y', P}^{(t+1)} - u_{X/Y', P}^{(t)}}
\]
%
2024-10-17 14:40:28 +02:00
where
%
\[
m' :=
\begin{cases}
n-1, & \textrm{ if } m = n,\\
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
m, & \textrm{ otherwise.}
2024-10-17 14:40:28 +02:00
\end{cases}
\]
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
Therefore, for $i \le p^n - p^{n-1}$
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
%
\begin{align*}
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\dim_k \mc T^i \mc M =
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
\begin{cases}
???,
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
In particular, $\dim_k \mc T^1 \mc M = \ldots = \dim_k \mc T^{p^{n-1} - p^{n-2}} \mc M$.
On the other hand, by Lemma~\ref{lem:TiM_isomorphism}:
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
%
\begin{align*}
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\dim_k \mc T^1 \mc M &= \dim_k T^1 \mc M + \ldots + \dim_k T^p \mc M\\
&\ge \dim_k T^{p^n - p^{n-1}} \mc M + \ldots + \dim_k T^{p^n - p^{n-1}} \mc M
= \dim_k \mc T^{p^{n-1} - p^{n-2}} \mc M.
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\end{align*}
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
Since the left-hand side and right hand side are equal, we conclude by Lemma~\ref{lem:TiM_isomorphism}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
that
%
\[
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\dim_k T^1 \mc M = \ldots = \dim_k T^{p^n - p^{n-1}} \mc M = \frac{1}{p} \dim_k \mc T^1 \mc M.
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\]
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
We consider now two cases. If the cover $X \to Y$ is \'{e}tale, then by Lemma~\ref{lem:G_invariants_etale} we have
%
\[
\dim_k T^1 \mc M = 2 g_{X''}
\]
then the cover $X \to Y$ must be also \'{e}tale.
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
Thus the proof follows in this case by~\cite{Nakajima??Inventiones}. Suppose now that
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
$X \to X''$ is not \'{e}tale. Then, by Lemma~\ref{lem:trace_surjective}, the map $\tr_{X/X''} : H^1_{dR}(X) \to H^1_{dR}(X'')$ is surjective. Moreover, note that in the group ring $k[H]$ we have:
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
%
\[
\tr_{X/X''} = \sum_{j = 0}^{p-1} (\sigma^{p^{n-1}})^j = (\sigma^{p^{n-1}} - 1)^{p-1} =
(\sigma - 1)^{p^n - p^{n-1}}.
\]
%
This implies that:
%
\[
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\ker(\tr_{X/X''} : \mc M \to \mc M'') = \mc M^{(p^n - p^{n-1})}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\]
%
and that $\tr_{X/X''}$ induces a $k$-linear isomorphism $T^{i + p^n - p^{n-1}} M \to \mc T^i M''$ for any $i \ge 1$. Thus:
%
\[
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\dim_k T^{i + p^n - p^{n-1}} \mc M = \dim_k \mc T^i \mc M'' = ....
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\]
%
This ends the proof.
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
\end{proof}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
\section{Hypoelementary covers}
%
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
Assume now that $G = H \rtimes_{\chi} \ZZ/c$.
%
\begin{Proposition} \label{prop:main_thm_for_hypoelementary}
Main Theorem holds for a hypoelementary $G$ as above and $k = \ol k$.
\end{Proposition}
%
\begin{Lemma}
Let $M$ be a $k[G]$-module of finite dimension. The $k[G]$-structure of $M$
is uniquely determined by the $k[C]$-structure of $T^1 M, \ldots, T^{p^n} M$.
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
???
\end{proof}
%
\begin{Lemma} \label{lem:N+Nchi+...}
Let $N_1$, $N_2$ be $k[G]$-modules. Assume that for some $j$
%
\[
N_1 \oplus N_1^{\chi} \oplus \ldots \oplus N_1^{\chi^j}
\cong N_2 \oplus N_2^{\chi} \oplus \ldots \oplus N_2^{\chi^j}.
\]
%
If $\GCD(j, p-1) = 1$, then $N_1 \cong N_2$. If $p-1 | j$, then
$N_1 \cong N_2^{\chi^i}$ for some $i$.
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
\end{proof}
%
\begin{Lemma} \label{lem:chevalley_weil_for_Z/p}
If $X$ has a $G$-action and $Y := X/H$,
then as $k[C]$-modules:
%
\[
H^1_{dR}(X) \cong H^1_{dR}(Y) \oplus N^{p-1}
\]
%
for a $k[C]$-module $N$ such that $N^{\chi} \cong N$.
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
??Chevalley--Weil??
??is it really needed ??
\end{proof}
%
\begin{Lemma} \label{lem:TiM_isomorphism_hypoelementary}
For any $i \le p^n - 1$:
%
\[
(\sigma - 1) : T^{i+1} M \hookrightarrow (T^i M)^{\chi^{-1}}.
\]
\end{Lemma}
\begin{proof}
\end{proof}
2024-10-17 15:02:25 +02:00
2024-10-17 20:22:54 +02:00
\begin{proof}[Proof of Proposition~\ref{prop:main_thm_for_hypoelementary}]
We prove this by induction on $n$. If $n = 0$, then it follows by Chevalley--Weil theorem.
Consider now two cases. Firstly, we assume that $X \to Y$ is \'{e}tale.
Recall that by proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:cyclic_de_rham}, the map $(\sigma - 1)$
is an isomorphism of $k$-vector spaces between $T^{i+1} \mc M$ and $T^i \mc M$ for
$i = 2, \ldots, p^n$. This yields an isomorphism of $k[C]$-modules for $i \ge 2$:
%
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:TiM=T1M_chi_etale}
T^i \mc M \cong (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-i+2}}
\end{equation}
%
Observe that $\mc T^i \mc M$ has the filtration $\mc M^{(pi)} \supset \mc M^{(pi - 1)} \supset \ldots \supset \mc M^{(pi - p)}$ with subquotients $T^{pi} \mc M, \ldots, T^{pi - p} \mc M$.
Thus, since the category of $k[C]$-modules is semisimple, for $i \le p^n - p^{n-1}$:
%
\begin{align*}
\mc T^i \mc M &\cong
\begin{cases}
T^1 \mc M \oplus T^2 \mc M \oplus \ldots \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-p + 1}}, & i = 1\\
T^2 \mc M \oplus \ldots \oplus (T^2 \mc M)^{\chi^{-p}}, & i > 1.
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
%
Thus, since by induction hypothesis $\mc T^i \mc M$ is determined by ramification data,
we have by Lemma~\ref{lem:N+Nchi+...} that $T^2 \mc M$ is determined by ramification data.
Moreover, by Lemma~\ref{lem:G_invariants_etale}, $T^1 \mc M \cong H^1_{dR}(X'')$
is also determined by ramification data (???).
Assume now that $X \to Y$ is not etale. Analogously as in the previous case, Lemma~\ref{lem:TiM_isomorphism_hypoelementary} and proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:cyclic_de_rham}
yield an isomorphism of $k[C]$-modules:
%
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:TiM=T1M_chi}
T^{i+1} \mc M \cong (T^1 \mc M)^{\chi^{-i}}
\end{equation}
%
for $i \le p^n - p^{n-1}$. Observe that $\mc T^i M$ has the filtration $\mc M^{(pi)} \supset \mc M^{(pi - 1)} \supset \ldots \supset \mc M^{(pi - p)}$ with subquotients $T^{pi} \mc M, \ldots, T^{pi - p + 1} \mc M$.
Thus, since the category of $k[C]$-modules is semisimple, for $i \le p^n - p^{n-1}$:
%
\begin{align*}
\mc T^i \mc M &\cong T^{pi - p + 1} \mc M \oplus \ldots \oplus T^{pi} \mc M\\
&\cong T^1 \mc M \oplus (T^1 \mc M)^{\chi^{-1}} \oplus \ldots \oplus
(T^1 \mc M)^{\chi^{-p}}.
\end{align*}
%
By induction assumption, the $k[C]$-module structure of $\mc T^i \mc M$ is uniquely determined by the ramification data. Thus, by Lemma~\ref{lem:N+Nchi+...} for $N := T^1 \mc M$ and by~\eqref{eqn:TiM=T1M_chi} the $k[C]$-structure of the modules $T^i \mc M$ is uniquely determined by the ramification data for $i \le p^n - p^{n-1}$.
By similar reasoning, $\tr_{X/X'}$ yields an isomorphism:
%
\[
T^{i + p^n - p^{n-1}} \mc M \cong (\mc T^i \mc M'')^{\chi^{-1??}}.
\]
%
Thus, by induction hypothesis for $\mc M''$, the $k[C]$-structure of $T^{i + p^n - p^{n-1}} \mc M$
is determined by ramification data as well.
\end{proof}
\section{Proof of Main Theorem}
%
(Conlon induction ???) (algebraic closure ???)
2024-10-17 13:22:42 +02:00
\bibliography{bibliografia}
\end{document}